| Some hypotheses on alien abductions |
|
|
|
| Written by Manuel Lamiroy |
| Wednesday, 25 November 2009 15:04 |
Some Hypotheses on Alien AbductionsI've been involved in alien abduction research since 1994. Over the years I've gained some insights which I think help explain the dynamics in the phenomenon. Below I'll first give the nutshell version of eight of my current ‘working hypotheses' with regard to Alien Abductions. Then, I'll elaborate shortly on each of the items.
In other words, abductions are carried out by:
* The Existence of a Treaty Quite a number of authors have mentioned this, but that in itself does not prove anything yet. However, one researcher I know has spoken to a person who has seen a copy of the actual treaty. Also, one person I worked with, who is now late and who was one of the people in charge of counterintelligence operations of a European country told me he had been briefed on the existence of an exchange programme between the USG and a group of extraterrestrial races (plural). As he himself pointed out, he could have been fed disinformation. The indications, however, are that such a treaty would indeed exist. Note also that it would be with a consortium, and that many abductees mention different species at the same location, and as part of the same operation.
The content of the treaty - permission to abduct in exchange for technology Again, a number of authors (like the late Bill Cooper, and Dan Sherman) mention this. The witness mentioned above sub item 1 also confirms this. Given that large numbers of abductees report being taken to a military facility, there is some corroboration for this assumption. (Unless this is part of a deception: create the impression that one is taken to a military basis in order to gain cooperation. It is likely that both are happening: real military presence and “virtual reality” military presence).
Involvement of the Military As I just mentioned, many abductees mention military personnel assisting the aliens. Three remarks: A) this is a fairly ‘recent' phenomenon, meaning that up until about 20 to 25 years ago, the abductions seem to have been mainly carried out by aliens only. B) David Jacobs' assumption that these must be hybrids wearing fake uniforms is incorrect. Abductees often can tell the difference. One abductee I worked with is adamant that he encountered human military personnel and that he recognised the rank etc. of the people he encountered. C) Greer's theory that all abductions are done by the military with some of them posing as aliens is too ridiculous to even warrant further attention. Abductees can tell the difference.
RE-ABS or MILABS, type 1 The US military often abducts abductees and questions them about their abductions. No aliens are present on those occasions. This is reported by numerous abductees.
Intruders Other aliens, with whom the USG has no arrangement, seem to be engaged in abductions as well. There are still lots of abductions where no humans are present. Probably part of these are done by the ones with whom a treaty exist. Testimonies by abductees who experienced type 1 MILABS, however, indicate that the Military is worried about another group (often referred to as ‘the others') and are desperate to find out what their agenda is.
PARAMILABS or MILABS, type 2 Closer analysis of MILAB cases reveal activities of a paramilitary group where humans are dressed in uniforms that look military in nature but are not the standard military uniforms. (Ingo Swann even reported to have been hired by them). It is at present unclear who these people are, and what their agenda is.
PLF abductions Personally I have not come across any evidence or indications of these. Greer is the sole source of information on them thus far, yet he is adamant that PLF abductions are a fact.
Virtual Reality Scenarios (VRS) and psyops In a virtual reality scenario, a person is led to believe that something did happen, while it did not. It could be compared to a kind of hypnotic suggestion. It can take many forms: you can see, e.g., a human person, while in reality, there is a Grey (and it's the Grey who ‘imposes' this image of a human person). Or you can believe you saw a UFO, went outside and stared at it through binoculars for a while, and then it went away, while in reality, you were abducted, and never stared through binoculars at all, etc. The possibility therefore exists, with each and every experience, that at least part of it didn't really happen, but only in the subject's mind, as an implanted memory. Needless to say that this complicates matters. – In my experience, VRS can be discovered by involuntary eye movements. But it would be good to get some backup / feedback on that from other people. Apart from VRS, other “psyops” are possible as well. The principle, however, is the same: external means are used to alter an individual's perceptions, memories and beliefs. * When it comes to WHY abductions are carried out, I still think the compilation by Lyssa Royal & Keith Priest with regard to the probable agendas and purposes gives the best insight. As possible motivations they list:
Note that all of these are the agendas of the extraterrestrials involved in abductions. Add to that the agendas / purposes of the humans that are involved in this:
|
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 29 December 2009 10:20 |



